Skip to Content
Altroverso
  • Practice
    • The Altroverso Practice
    • How It Works
    • Why We Do It
    • About
    • Founders
    • FAQ
  • Services
    • Document & Evidence
    • Juridical & Contracts
    • Governance
    • Risk Management
    • Compliance
    • Digital & Privacy
    • Certification Enablement
  • Library
  • Academy
  • Contact
  • Client Area
  • 0
  • 0
  • Nederlands English (US)
  • CLIENT AREA
Altroverso
  • 0
  • 0
    • Practice
      • The Altroverso Practice
      • How It Works
      • Why We Do It
      • About
      • Founders
      • FAQ
    • Services
      • Document & Evidence
      • Juridical & Contracts
      • Governance
      • Risk Management
      • Compliance
      • Digital & Privacy
      • Certification Enablement
    • Library
    • Academy
    • Contact
    • Client Area
  • Nederlands English (US)
  • CLIENT AREA

Director liable after false financing basis

  • All Blogs
  • RULINGS
  • Director liable after false financing basis
  • April 10, 2026 by
    Paolo Maria Pavan


    What is the situation?

    On 27 January 2026, the Court of Appeal The Hague reopened and reversed part of its earlier judgment after finding procedural fraud under Article 382 Rv. The court held a director personally liable for €150,000 plus €31,155.06 in legal costs. The director had used a dormant BV to sign a property purchase agreement without proper financing.

    The BV had no funds. The director stopped the bank financing route. He instead relied on a risky resale to a third party, without secured pre-financing and without transparency to the seller. The court found he knew, or should have understood, that the BV could not perform and would offer no recovery if the deal failed.

    Analysis

    This is a sharp warning that limited liability does not protect directors who contract through shell companies while gambling on funding that is not actually secured.

    For micro and small businesses, the real signal is not real estate specific. It concerns decision integrity. If you sign through a BV that has no capital, no committed financing, and no realistic fallback, the court may move past the company and look directly at the director.

    A common challenge is that entrepreneurs sometimes regard anticipated future cash, positive expectations, or intended resale as actual financing. However, these are not substitutes for documented liquidity, aligned transaction structure, or transparent communication.

    Impact

    H1

    Do not sign major purchase agreements through a thinly capitalized BV unless financing is real, documented, and still available. Conditional expectations are not a funding strategy.

    H2

    Review all deals where performance depends on resale, investor money, or informal support. If the fallback fails, director liability may follow. This is especially true where counterparties were misled.

    H3

    This judgment strengthens a key Dutch rule: the BV shields normal business risk, not reckless contracting. Weak governance can turn a company's exposure into personal exposure.

    Daily operational takeaway

    Check every signed or pending contract where your company lacks cash coverage today. Verify funding, fallback, and what the counterparty was told.

    ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2026:331 The Hague Court of Appeal

    in RULINGS
    # COURT CASE COURT RULING Paolo Maria Pavan
    Paolo Maria Pavan April 10, 2026
    Share this post

    Share

    Tags
    COURT CASE COURT RULING Paolo Maria Pavan
    Our blogs
    • MARKET
    • RULINGS
    • RISK AND COMPLIANCE
    • Our blog
    Hidden turnover becomes private tax exposure

    Upcoming Events

    Explore what’s happening next and join the moments that matter.

    See All
    Your Dynamic Snippet will be displayed here... This message is displayed because you did not provide enough options to retrieve its content.

    Altroverso

    Altroverso creates and maintains ONE FILE: one coherent company architecture connecting governance, contracts, risk, fiscal control, digital systems, decisions and evidence.

    Different authorised stakeholders may see different parts. Every part must tell the same truth about who the company is, where it is going, how it operates, when it checks itself and why it acts.

    KvK: 56530021
    BTW: NL 852171936 B 01
    BECON: 746393

    2012-2026 © Altroverso. All rights reserved.

    Practice

    About Altroverso
    How We Work
    Why Altroverso
    Leadership
    FAQ

    Services

    Juridical and Contractual Architecture
    Governance and Risk
    Compliance and Fiscal Control
    Digital, Data and Privacy
    Certification Readiness
    Recovery and Remediation

    Knowledge
    • Library
      Latest Analysis
      Altroverso Board Brief
      Academy
      Client Area
    • Confidential enquiries
    • Use the confidential intake for a defined matter, an integrated assessment, implementation support, recovery work or a retained GRC mandate.
    Get in touch
    • +31 (0)85 40 19 174

    • Altroverso
    • De Stuwdam 33-35
    • 3815 KM Amersfoort
      The Netherlands
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Data and Privacy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Salary and Employment Policy
    Website Logo

    Your privacy is part of our practice.

    May this website use optional cookies in this browser?

    Essential cookies support the operation and security of the website. Optional cookies help us understand how the site is used. You can read more in our Cookie Policy and change your choice later.

    Allow all cookiesOnly allow essential cookies